Executive Summary & Context
The Microsoft Teams product team faces a critical resource allocation challenge in Q2 2024. With 320 million MAU and growing enterprise adoption, we must strategically prioritize our engineering efforts to maximize user impact while maintaining system stability and technical excellence.
Business Context
6 weeks available (48 person-days)
8 developers (4 frontend, 3 backend, 1 mobile)
Desktop (Windows/Mac), Mobile (iOS/Android), Web
320M MAU, 75% enterprise, 25% consumer
Key Stakeholders
Technical feasibility & resource allocation
UX consistency & user research
Competitive positioning
Analytics & measurement
Enterprise requirements
Technical Backlog Analysis
AI-Powered Meeting Recaps
- Integration with Azure OpenAI Service (GPT-4)
- Real-time transcript processing pipeline
- Natural language processing for action item detection
- Multi-language support (initial: EN, ES, FR, DE)
- GDPR/SOC2 compliant data handling
- 99.9% availability SLA requirement
Architecture Considerations
- Microservice: New meeting-intelligence service
- Storage: Encrypted blob storage for transcripts
- API: GraphQL endpoint for summary retrieval
- Caching: Redis for processed summaries
Expanded Emojis & GIFs
- Update emoji font packages (Segoe UI Emoji, Apple Color Emoji)
- Extend Tenor API integration with new categories
- Add 127 new Unicode 15.0 characters
- Update emoji picker React components
- Accessibility improvements (screen reader support)
Performance Impact
- Bundle Size: +2.3MB font assets
- Load Time: <5ms impact (lazy loading)
- Memory: +8MB RAM per client
Cross-Platform File Sync Fix
- Race condition in sync conflict resolution
- Mobile app offline queue corruption
- SharePoint API rate limiting on bulk operations
- Delta sync token expiration handling
Proposed Solution
- Sync Engine: Implement exponential backoff
- Conflict Resolution: Last-write-wins with metadata
- Queue Management: SQLite WAL mode for mobile
- Monitoring: Enhanced telemetry for sync health
"Quick Polls" in Channels
- Multiple choice polls (2-10 options)
- Anonymous vs. attributed voting modes
- Real-time result updates via SignalR
- Poll expiration and auto-close functionality
- Mobile parity across iOS/Android
Data Architecture
- Schema: New Poll entity with Vote relationships
- Real-time: SignalR hubs for live updates
- Permissions: Channel-based access control
- Analytics: Engagement tracking events
Enhanced 'Do Not Disturb' Mode
- Role-based notification filtering (reports, managers)
- Time-zone aware scheduling engine
- Meeting calendar integration
- Priority keyword detection
- Urgent override mechanisms
Technical Implementation
- Service: Notification routing microservice
- Rules Engine: Redis-based rule evaluation
- Calendar API: Graph API integration
- Push Service: Azure Notification Hubs
Technical RICE Framework Analysis
Quantitative Prioritization Methodology
The RICE framework provides objective scoring by quantifying business impact against engineering effort. Each component is weighted based on data-driven estimates from user research, analytics, and technical architecture reviews.
Monthly Active Users impacted within 30 days of release
Expected improvement in North Star metrics (engagement, satisfaction)
Statistical confidence in estimates based on research quality
Total engineering person-weeks including testing, deployment, monitoring
Detailed RICE Scorecard
| Feature | Reach (M users) |
Impact (1-5) |
Confidence (%) |
Effort (weeks) |
RICE Score | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expanded Emojis & GIFs | 250M | 1 | 95% | 1 | 237.5 | Low |
| Quick Polls in Channels | 120M | 3 | 90% | 4 | 81.0 | Medium |
| AI-Powered Meeting Recaps | 100M | 5 | 80% | 6 | 66.7 | High |
| Cross-Platform File Sync Fix | 50M | 4 | 100% | 3 | 66.7 | Medium |
| Enhanced DND Mode | 80M | 2 | 70% | 2 | 56.0 | Low |
Data Sources for Reach Estimates
- Telemetry: Daily active emoji usage (87% of users)
- A/B Tests: Previous content updates showed 95% adoption
- User Research: 15 interviews, 2,500 survey responses
- Competitive Analysis: Slack emoji usage patterns
Impact Methodology
- Engagement: Expected 2-3% increase in message volume
- Satisfaction: 0.1 point CSAT improvement
- Retention: